The Evidence

If "Religion is the Opiate of the Masses," Science is the Opiate of the Intellectual Classes.

Do you really believe you're an Evolving Ape, or that God will Take Your Call? It's time to end this destructive conflict.

Topics for Discussion

Apes or Exiled Aliens: Think and go Free

Academia’s Conflicting Creation “Myths”

There are two basic creation constructs:

The Atheistic Theory of Creation, with Darwin as Messiah.
This construct is based on Darwin’s Theory of Evolution. It is approximately one hundred and sixty years old. The “theory” claims that humans are evolving apes with no future but eternal death.

The Historical Construct of Creation, with Jesus as Messiah.
This construct is based on five thousand, five hundred years of recorded history. It begins with the creation of Adam and Eve in Eden, and ends with the destruction of the temple and fall of Jerusalem. It reveals that you are a creation of the Almighty God, with a glorious future of eternal life in paradise.

The Evidence

Atheistic Creation
In the nearly two hundred years since Darwin postulated his Theory of Evolution; scientists have not produced a single piece of empirical evidence to verify their Atheistic Creation Myth. Notwithstanding, it is imposed on every child in elementary school as a “scientific reality,” and a safe alternative to religion.

Biblical Creation
There is five thousand, five hundred years of recorded history defining Biblical Creation. That history is supported by empirical evidence found in the Earths’ tilted axis, rainbow phenomenon, climate, calendar, and the collapse of the ancient world. Libraries, artifacts, and archaeological ruins, on every continent of the globe, affirm the reality of Biblical Creation.

The Atheistic Creation Myth
This myth was concocted by the atheists in academia, approximately one hundred and sixty years ago. It is based on a theory postulated in Darwin’s book titled The Origin of Species.[1] Darwin’s book was an effort to explain the earth’s wide variety of species of plants and animals etc. through evolution, natural selection, and survival of the fittest. Darwin did not attempt to explain creation. His hypothesis was an attempt to discredit the biblical construct of “Separate Creations,” by using evolution to explain the plethora of sub-species of animals. I think he confused adaptation with evolution, but that is another discussion.[2] Nevertheless, the atheists in science, seeking to topple their adversaries in theology, history, and the church, advanced the myth that evolution could explain creation. They proposed that the entire universe is the result of a spontaneous mixing of gasses in the great void of space. According to the atheists, over a period of “billions of years,” that primeval soup evolved into the complex system of planets in our solar system, and evolution produced the vast array of life, including humans, that we find on the earth.

Unfortunately, after nearly two hundred years, scientists have not produced one single piece of empirical evidence to affirm either the theory of evolution, or their atheistic creation myth.[3] It seems incredible to me that “the spontaneous mixing of gasses in space” construct is the figment of some unknown atheist’s imagination, concocted in the deep ignorance of the dark ages, and presented as evidence for the Theory of Evolution. It is not backed by a single piece of empirical evidence. In fact, Darwin’s hypothesis was roundly criticized by his fellow scientists, Nageli, Picket, Bronn , Broca, and Richard Owen.[4] Darwin himself admitted that his theory placed too much emphasis on natural selection and the survival of the fittest.

I think that the following quote from Darwin’s book Descent of Man, will provide some insight into his thinking, and the mind-set of ideological science in the 1800s. This revealing quote is Darwin, in his own words, acknowledging the flaws in his theory that “natural selection and the survival of the fittest,” was the evolutionary process that initiated the “Origin of Species.”

I now admit, after reading the essay by Nageli on plants, and the remarks by various authors with respect to animals, more especially those recently made by Professor Broca, that in the earlier editions of my Origin of Species I probably attributed too much to the action of natural selection or the survival of the fittest. I have altered the fifth edition of the Origin so as to confine my remarks to adaptive changes of the structure. I had not formerly sufficiently considered the existence of many structures which appear to be, as far as we can judge, neither beneficial nor injurious; and this I believe to be one of the greatest oversights as yet detected in my work. I may be permitted to say as some excuse, that I had two distinct objects in view,firstly to shew that species had not been separately created, and secondly, that natural selection had been the chief agent of change, though largely aided by the inherited effects of habit, and slightly by the direct action of the surrounding conditions. Nevertheless, I was not able to annul the influence of my former belief, then widely prevalent, that each species had been purposely created; and this led to my tacitly assuming that every detail of structure, excepting rudiments, was of some special, though unrecognised, service. Any one with this assumption in his mind would naturally extend the action of natural selection, either during past or present times, too far. Some of those who admit the principle of evolution, but reject natural selection, seem to forget, when criticising my book, that I had the above two objects in view; hence if I have erred in giving to natural selection great power, which I am far from admitting, or in having exaggerated its power, which is in itself probable, I have at least, as I hope, done good service in aiding to overthrow the dogma of separate creations. (Darwin, Descent of Man p.152-3; Ch. 4, part 1)

This quote is very revealing on several counts. First, we see the great controversy surrounding Darwin; his theories were roundly criticized by his contemporaries in secular science. Second, he admits that he confused adaptation with evolution. Third, Darwin reveals a sizable ego by only half-admitting his errors, and blames his fellow scientists for “extending the action of natural selection, either during past or present times, too far.” We can add Nazi scientists to the list of people who made that tragic mistake.[5] Finally, Darwin suggests that his fellow scientists should overlook the errors in his theories because they have helped to destroy the concept of “separate creations.” In other words, it was quite all right to fudge on the facts as long as scientists prevailed in their ideological jihad with the clergy. Disgraceful! At one time it may have been tolerable to allow for some flaws in the “theory” of evolution; after one hundred and sixty years, it is inexcusable. We must decide: Is the theory of evolution a truth or a myth?[6]

The evidence will prove that the Atheistic Theory of Creation is a modern myth, based entirely on Darwin’s unproven “theory” of Evolution. Communist movements embraced this myth, and joined the atheists in an effort to overthrow the theological monarchies of Europe. These radicals sought to use Darwin’s theory of Evolution to discredit the Bible, overthrow the church backed monarchies, and impose the communist model of economics on the people. Atheistic revolutions overthrew governments in Russia, China, Cuba, Korea, Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia etc. Atheistic dictators like Stalin, Mao, Kim Il-sung, Fidel Castro, Ho Chi Minh, Pol Pot etc. killed all who opposed atheism, and imposed communism on their economies. Atheistic revolutions, and the leader of their tyrannical governments, have killed more people than Judaism, Christianity, and Islam combined; notwithstanding, it is considered a safe alternative to religion, and imposed on every child in elementary school.

In his book, Evolution, A Theory in Crisis, Dr. Michael Denton makes the following extraordinary statement about Darwin’s Theory of Evolution:

One might have expected that a theory of such cardinal importance, a theory that literally changed the world, would have been something more than metaphysics, something more than myth. Ultimately the Darwinian theory of evolution is no more nor less than the great cosmogenic myth of the twentieth century. (Denton, p.358).

Dr. Denton is right; the “Theory” of Evolution is a great myth, second only to myth that spawned it; Atheism. Atheistic Evolution is the single most destructive myth ever foisted on humanity. Scientist, blinded by their frustration with the church hierarchy’s domination of academia, allowed the atheists to use Darwin’s inherently flawed theory on the origin of species to become the core tenet of “empirical science.” The atheists were quick to show their tyrannical nature. They declared the biblical / historical account of creation myth, banned it from science and academia, and imposed Darwin’s theory of evolution on every child in elementary school, as the only “scientific” explanation for human existence

Did Darwin’s theory of Evolution cause the Holocaust? See my book The Awful Truth Chp. 3, pp. 155-160, and the link The Holocaust: Truth vs. Myths.

Historical / Biblical Creation
Unlike Darwin’s theory of evolution, the biblical history of creation is not a theory, myth, or a handbook for religion. Over a period of thousands of years, our ancestors recorded a continuous chronology of the interaction between the God of Abraham and the descendants of Adam and Eve. The documentation begins at the time of Adam’s creation, and ends with the fall of Jerusalem. Contrary to theological belief, it is not a handbook for religion; it is a closed history. The chronology does not reveal the age of the earth, it merely marks the point at which God formed Adam and Eve, and ends in a great battle of the gods called the Battle of Armageddon. Precisely as foretold, that battle coincided with the destruction of the temple and desolation of Jerusalem in AD70. At that point, all communication with the gods ceased, the ancient world came to an end, and humans inherited the earth in the deep ignorance of the dark ages of the early modern world. That reality is backed by empirical evidence in the earth’s tilted axis, climate, calendar, and the rainbow phenomenon. The historical libraries, fossil record, artifacts, and archaeological ruins of the ancient world on every continent of the globe, catalogue the evidence. That limitless empirical evidence is designed to reveal our origin, purpose, and future, and give peace to a lost and lonely race of humans, exiled in death on planet Earth. Its central theme reveals that all of the descendants of Adam and Eve will be restored to life after death. All, not some, or those who join a religion; all of the descendants of Adam and Eve will be restored to life. You are a descendant of Adam and Eve.

For since by man came death, by man came also the resurrection of the dead. For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive. 1Cor.15: 21-22.

Therefore as by the offense of one [Adam] judgment came upon all men to condemnation: even so by the righteousness of one [Messiah] the free gift came upon all men unto justification [acquittal] and life. Rom 5:18

And I swear to you, that there has already been prepared, for every man who has been in his mother’s womb, a place for the repose of his soul, and for each one, a fixed period of time for how long he will be tried in this world.
Yes, children, do not deceive yourselves, God has already prepared a place for the soul of every man.
Enoch 49:1-5.

Apes or the Exiled Aliens of Eden?
Humans are not evolving apes; as recorded in biblical history, we are alien spiritual beings (eternal souls) clothed in mortal bodies, and exiled into death on planet earth at the dawn of history.

Give Students a Choice
If the elites in academia do not have the courage to admit that the “theory of Evolution” is a reactionary atheistic creation myth, then they should give their students a choice. Instead of indoctrinating children with Darwin’s theory of creation, as is currently done in science courses; academia should reveal both of these creation paradigms to their students, and let them choose which one they think is the truth.

Did the second coming of Jesus cause the collapse of the ancient world? You decide; Discovery

If you have not read our answer, please click on the Discovery link before leaving the website. It reveals the Truth.

To facilitate a discussion of this world-changing discovery, we have made the evidence available for free on the website. United we will stand. We ask you to use our new social media links below to discuss this wonderful discovery with your family and friends, and send us your comments: Contact the Realists.

[1] Published in1859.

[2] Species do show signs of adaptation, but not evolution. There are no new species.

[3] There is a wealth of evidence against the theory of evolution in my book The Awful Truth.

[4] Dr. Michael Denton Evolution A Theory in Crisis & The Awful Truth, Chp. 1, pp. 9-16.

[5] See link; The Holocaust, Truth vs. Myth @www.realists.com & The Awful Truth, Chp. 3, pp.155-160.

[6] Based on an excerpt from The Awful Truth, Chp. 1, pp.4-18.

Password Reset

Please enter your e-mail address. You will receive a new password via e-mail.