The Rapture: Truth vs. Myth
The Rapture of the Elect!
One of the tenets of Evangelical Christianity is a doctrine called the “Rapture.” This doctrine teaches that in conjunction with the second coming of Messiah, the followers of Jesus will be removed from the earth, while yet alive. We agree that this doctrine is well grounded in Scripture; however, unlike the Evangelicals, who claim this event is yet to occur, we are convinced that the historical evidence proves that the Rapture occurred in a.d.63, seven years prior to the fall of Jerusalem, in a.d.70. The scriptures pertaining to this teaching are numerous; however, we will start with a few of the more specific, and provide an additional list at the end of the link.
For this we say unto you by the word of the Lord, that we which are alive and remain unto the coming of the Lord shall not precede them which are dead.
16. For the Lord Himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first:
17. Then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord.
18. Wherefore comfort one another with these words. 1 Thes. 4:15-18.
Behold I show you a mystery; we shall not all sleep, (die) but we shall all be changed,
52. In a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trump: for the trumpet shall sound, and the dead shall be raised incorruptible, and we shall all be changed.
53. For this corruptible must put on incorruption and this mortal must put on immortality.
55. O death, where is thy sting? O grave, where is thy victory? 1 Cor. 15:51-53 & 55. (See also Phil. 3:21, 11 Cor. 5:4)
In these verses, Paul tells the disciples that they would live to see the second coming of Jesus, and that they would be removed from the earth while yet alive.
By using the personal plural pronoun “we,” Paul makes it unmistakably clear that he himself intended to take part in the Rapture. A proper understanding of the word “we” is critical to the interpretation of these verses. When the personal plural pronoun “we” is used the writer is including himself and the people addressed. In addition, the use of “we” excludes everyone else and limits this promise to the people indicated in the verse. That would include Paul, and those to whom these letters are addressed in the ancient cities of Thessalonica and Corinth. By choosing to use the very specific pronoun “we” in these verses, Paul makes it impossible to extend this privilege beyond those mentioned in the verses.
It is also significant that Paul states that they would be caught up together to meet the Lord in the clouds, because Jesus told many people that they would see him coming in the clouds. In response to a question of the High Priest, Jesus says;
Thou hast said: nevertheless I say unto you, Hereafter shall ye see the Son of man sitting on the right hand of power, and coming in the clouds of heaven. Mat. 26:64.
In this verse Jesus tells the high priest that he will see the Son of man coming in the clouds.
Behold he cometh with clouds; and every eye shall see him, and they also which pierced him: and all kindreds of the earth shall wail because of him. Even so A’men. Rev. 1:7.
In this last verse, John states that those who pierced Jesus shall see him coming in the clouds. This is important, because it was the Romans soldiers who nailed Jesus to the cross; therefore, for this prophecy to be accurate, those soldiers would have to have lived to see this event. Historical evidence that they did indeed witness the second coming of Jesus is provided in the account of the fall of Jerusalem by the Roman historian Tacitus.
Prodigies had occurred, which this nation, prone to superstition, but hating all religious rites, did not deem it lawful to expiate by offering and sacrifice. There had been seen hosts joining battle in the skies, the fiery gleam of arms, the temple illuminated by a sudden radiance from the clouds. The doors of the inner shrine were suddenly thrown open, and a voice of more than mortal tone was heard to cry that the Gods were departing. At the same instant there was a mighty stir as of departure.See Tacitus; The Histories 5:11-13, & 2 Ki. 2:11, 6:17.
The Jewish Historian Josephus, provides an equally graphic account of these events. These are some excerpts from his writings:
They (the Jews) neither heeded nor believed in the manifest portents that foretold the coming desolation, but as if thunderstruck and bereft of eyes and mind, disregarded the plain warnings of God. So it was when a star, resembling a sword, stood over the city, and a comet which continued for a year. (See Mat. 24:30)
Again, not many days after the festival, on the twenty-first of the month Artemisium, there appeared a miraculous phenomenon, passing belief. Indeed, what I am about to relate would, I imagine, have been deemed a fable, were it not for the narratives of eyewitnesses and for the subsequent calamities which deserved to be so signalized.* For before sunset throughout all parts of the country chariots were seen in the air and armed battalions hurtling through the clouds and encompassing the cities.” Josephus; Wars of the Jews B.6,5:3-4. See 2 Ki. 2:11, 6:17.
“The “subsequent calamities” mentioned by Josephus, refer to the destruction of the Temple and fall of Jerusalem in a.d.70, followed by the fall of the gods and collapse of the ancient world.
Notice that both of these historians report that chariots and men were seen in the sky above Jerusalem. This is a precise fulfillment of the prophecy that the people of that generation would see Jesus in the clouds.
In the Old Testament book of 1 Kings, we read of the departure of Elijah from the earth.
And it came to pass as they still went on, and talked, that, behold, there appeared a chariot of fire, and horses of fire, and parted them both asunder; and Eli’jah went up by a whirlwind into heaven. I Kings 2:11. See also 6:17.
The similarity of these two events is startling. We are of the opinion that as Elijah was taken out of the earth yet alive, so too were the disciples of Jesus raptured (removed from the earth) at his Second Coming.
One of the most compelling pieces of evidence for the Rapture of the saints in a.d.63-70, is the lack of any biblical or historical record of the death of the apostles. It is astounding, but neither the Bible or secular history records their deaths. Equally important is the lack of any mention of the Roman siege of Jerusalem, or a description of the destruction of the temple in their writings. If the apostles were still on the earth after a.d.70, why did they fail to record the cataclysmic destruction of the temple? There can be only one explanation – they had already been taken from the Earth yet alive as prophesied; therefore, they were not there to see or experience that incredible cataclysm. (The death of the apostles is part of Catholic tradition, but those beliefs cannot be verified with either biblical or secular history.)
The lack of any record of the death of the apostles in biblical or secular history, combined with the fact that they did not chronicle the destruction of the temple, or produce any writings after a.d.63, is compelling. It is powerful evidence to support the position that, precisely as prophesied, at the second coming of Messiah, the elect were removed from the earth, while yet alive.
The death and resurrection of Lazarus is additional evidence that the Rapture is a historical reality. Lazarus, having been dead four days in the tomb, had paid the penalty for Adam’s transgression. Having died once, when Messiah called him from the tomb he was physically “Born Again.” The death of Adam no longer reigned in his body; therefore, he could not have died again, except by a direct judgment from God. The book of Hebrews clearly states that man will only die once;
And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment. Heb. 9:27.
If that Scripture is to remain unbroken Lazarus could not have died a second death, except as a direct act from the hand of God. There is no mention of such an event in the Bible. This creates a major flaw in Christian theology. For the Bible to be accurate, Lazarus had to be either taken from the earth alive, or he must be still walking the planet. The only way to resolve this dilemma, is to accept the fact that Lazarus and the elect of Israel were taken from the earth, yet alive, at the second coming of Jesus in a.d.63-70.
This biblical dilemma would also apply to the Old Testament saints who were resurrected with Jesus as recorded in Matthew.
And the graves opened; and many bodies of the saints which slept arose,
53 And came out of the graves after his resurrection, and went into the Holy city, and appeared unto many. Mat. 27:52-53.
Once these Old Testament Saints were resurrected from the dead with Jesus, they would have to be removed from the earth alive.
This prophecy would also apply to the apostles and disciples who received the Holy Spirit at Pentecost. When the apostles received the Holy Spirit, they passed from the Adamic death into the second life. They were literally “Born Again,” and could not die; therefore, they too had to be removed from the earth yet alive. There is no need for a “Rapture” after their generation. The sole purpose of the biblical “Rapture” was to remove the resurrected Old Testament saints, Lazarus, and those who were “Born Again” from the earth, because they could not die twice. That incredible miracle occurred in a.d.63-70, that is why there is no record of their deaths or any evidence that they were on the earth after the fall of Jerusalem.
The Book of Revelation
Christianity claims that the Apostle John wrote the Book of Revelation on the Isle of Patmos in a.d.90. If John was still on the earth in the year a.d.90, surely he would have recorded the cataclysmic destruction of the temple and fall of Jerusalem, precisely as prophesied by Jesus, in a.d.70, . He did not. There can be only one explanation for John’s failure to record the precise fulfillment of the prophecies of Jesus in his writings; he was removed from the Earth, yet alive, at the Rapture of the saints in a.d.63. The Book of Revelation does not mention the Isle of Patmos, or the year that it was written. Notwithstanding, it is the only “evidence” Christianity can point to that the Apostles were on the earth after a.d.63. John’s name was not in the original text, it was inserted after the fact.
Additional Scriptures for the Rapture
There are many scriptures in the Old Testament which prophesy this great event. Let us examine a few.
Behold the days come, saith the Lord, that I will raise unto David a righteous Branch, and a King shall reign and prosper, and shall execute judgment and justice in the earth
6 In his days Judah shall be saved, and Israel shall dwell safely: and this is his name whereby he shall be called, The Lord Our Righteousness.
7 Therefore, behold, the days come, saith the Lord, that they shall no more say, The Lord liveth, which brought up the children of Israel out of the land of Egypt;
8 But, The Lord liveth, which brought up and which led the seed of the house of Israel out of the north country, and from all countries whither I had driven them; and they shall dwell in their own land. Jer. 23:5-8. (See also Jer. 16:14)
In these verses Jeremiah makes the incredible statement that the events that will occur when the Messiah comes to save Judah will be so phenomenal, that God will no longer be known for the miraculous way in which He brought Israel out of Egypt; therefore, we know that this will be a truly spectacular rescue (salvation).
Then shall the children of Judah and the children of Israel be gathered together, and appoint themselves one head, and they shall come up out of the land (earth): for great shall (be) the day of Jezreel. Hosea 1:11. (See Hos. 6:2, John 10:16)
In this verse Hosea states that the Messiah will reunite the divided kingdoms of Israel and Judah, and remove the remnant of Israel from the earth. Both Hosea and Jeremiah state that this event (Rapture) is limited to the house of Israel and Judah; therefore, contrary to Christian doctrine, it cannot apply to anyone here in the modern world.
The Second Coming of Messiah
If your religion has told you that the Second Coming of Messiah is a future event, please consider these statements by Jesus. When brought to trial before the council of elders in Jerusalem, the High Priest challenged the Messiah with these words:
I adjure thee by the living God, that thou tell us whether thou be the Messiah, the Son of God. Mat. 26:63.
Jesus responded with this declarative statement:
Jesus said unto him, Thou hast said: nevertheless, I say unto you, Hereafter shall you see the Son of man sitting on the right hand of power, and coming in the clouds of heaven. Para. Mat. 26:64.
In these verses, Jesus affirms that he is the Messiah, and tells the High Priest that he will live to see him “sitting on the right hand of power, and coming in the clouds of heaven.” That is the second coming of the Messiah. In conjunction with the destruction of the temple and fall of Jerusalem in AD70, the historians Josephus and Tacitus recorded eyewitness accounts of supernatural beings in the clouds above the city.
When speaking to his disciples, Jesus said:
Verily I say unto you, There be some standing here, which shall not taste of death, till they see the Son of man coming in his kingdom. Mat 16: 28.
In this verse, Jesus reveals that some of those present in the crowd would live to see his second coming.
On another occasion, the Messiah told his Disciples:
But when they persecute you in this city, flee ye into another: for verily I say unto you, Ye shall not have gone over the cities of Israel, till the Son of man be come. Mat. 10:23.
In this verse, Jesus tells his disciples that they would not be able to visit all of the cities of Israel before the second coming.
Matthew chapter 24, is the definitive chapter on the second coming of Messiah:
In verses 1-3, Jesus ties his coming in power to the destruction of the temple and the end of the ancient world. The chapter begins as Jesus is leaving the temple. The disciples praise the magnificence of the buildings, and Jesus says to them:
See ye not all these things? verily I say unto you, There shall not be left here one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down.
And as he sat upon the mount of Olives, the disciples came unto him privately, saying, Tell us, when shall these things be and what the sign of thy coming, and of the end of the [ancient] world? Mat. 24:1-3.
Messiah proceeds to tell them all of the terrible “tribulations” that will coincide with the destruction of the temple; including, civil war, famine, pestilence, the desolation of Jerusalem, and then, in verse 34, he tells his disciples that they will live to see the fulfillment of all of the events foretold in Matthew 24, including his second coming and the end of the [ancient] world:
Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass, till all these things be fulfilled.
Isaiah and Ezekiel made similar prophecies, and said that the destruction of the temple would be a sign from God.
And shall not God avenge his own elect, which cry day and night unto him, though he bear long with them?
8 I tell you, that he will avenge them at once, nevertheless when the Son of man cometh, shall he find faith on the earth? Luke 18:7 & 8
And when these things begin to come to pass, then look up, and lift up your heads; for your redemption draweth nigh. Luke 21:28.
In the following verses, Jesus tells the disciples that they will experience the second coming.
So likewise ye, when ye see these things come to pass, know ye that the kingdom of God is nigh at hand.
32 Verily I say unto you, this generation shall not pass away, till all be fulfilled. Luke 21:31-32.
Watch ye therefore, and pray always, that ye may be accounted worthy to escape all these things that shall come to pass, and to stand before the Son of man. Luke 21:36.
Clearly the “ye” and the “your” found in these verses of Luke, are intended for the people that Jesus is speaking to, as is the use of the term “this generation.”
The New Testament portion of ancient Israel’s history clearly states that the second coming of Jesus is tied to the destruction of the temple and desolation of Jerusalem. Precisely as prophesied, in a.d.70, the temple was destroyed, and the city of Jerusalem was left utterly desolate! It is impossible to deny the implications inherent in that historical reality!
Biblical and secular history provide empirical evidence that; the second coming of Messiah Jesus coincided with the destruction of the temple and desolation of Jerusalem in a.d.63-70. Precisely as foretold, at that point, the satanic forces who ruled the pagan ancient world were destroyed, the apostles and disciples were taken from the earth yet alive, and the meek (lowly humans) inherited the earth. Ps. 37:11 & Mat. 5:5.
The Bible is an ancient world text. Where it foretells the end of the world it is referring to the ancient world. Did that world come to an end as prophesied? You Decide.
Empirical evidence that the Second Coming of Jesus coincided with the destruction of the temple and fall of Jerusalem in a.d.63-70 can be found in the libraries, artifacts, and archaeological ruins of the ancient world on every continent of the globe.
Precisely as foretold in the history of ancient Israel, the Rapture of the Saints coincided with the second coming of Messiah in a.d.70, The Bible is a closed history. Studying it in that context, will reveal our origins, purpose, and future, and give us inner and universal peace.
If you have not read the synopsis, please click on the Discovery link before leaving the website.
We ask you to use our new Face Book link below to discuss this wonderful discovery with your family and friends, and send us your comments: Contact the Realists.